Home Value Investing The return of the “Freedom Power basket”: ABO Wind vs Energiekontor (BUY)

The return of the “Freedom Power basket”: ABO Wind vs Energiekontor (BUY)

The return of the “Freedom Power basket”: ABO Wind vs Energiekontor (BUY)


Dislaimer: This isn’t funding recommendation. PLEASE DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH !!!!


A few of my readers would possibly keep in mind, that I purchased right into a “Freedom vitality” basket in March 2022 to be able to “hedge” in opposition to probably catastrophic results from the Russia/Ukraine warfare. After a primary good run, I bought 3 out of the preliminary 4 (7C Photo voltaic, PNE, Energiekontor and ABO Wind) and solely stored ABO Wind as a result of I thought-about it essentially the most undervalued inventory.

Trying on the chart we are able to see that for among the shares of that basket, not a lot occurred, solely PNE remains to be vital above the extent of March 2022 (ABO Wind is the strong Yellow chart):

ABO Wind is my remaining Renewable Power funding with a weight of three%. The idea of the thesis was, that the inventory is comparatively low-cost and that on account of a major possession stake of its founders, long run pursuits of Administration and shareholders needs to be nicely aligned.

As well as, I do suppose that the worth creation potential for builders within the present surroundings is considerably increased than for pure “operators” similar to 7C or Encavis.

Germany: One thing is going on right here

Some would possibly keep in mind the Speeches of German politician, calling renewable Power “freedom Power” from final yr. A variety of stuff was introduced, particularly lofty targets for extra Renewable vitality, however initially little or nothing occurred. Nevertheless now, after nearly 1,5 years, issues in Germany are shifting. One factor specifically stands out: It actually appears like that Onshore Wind permits, that was very cumbersome to acquire, appear now to maneuver a lot sooner than a yr in the past. I’ve heard this from a number of sources, that the velocity of allowing and so forth. lastly has been significantly improved and that builders now can develop and construct particularly Windparks a lot sooner.

Who’s to revenue most from this ? After all Builders with an enormous presence (and pipeline) in Germany. From my basket, those with the largest German improvement exposures is clearly Energiekontor (~50% share Germany~ 4GW). ABO Wind has round 2GW German pipeline (10%). PNE has the same sized German improvement pipeline but in addition some extra unique international locations like Vietnam and South Africa. So Energiekontor is clearly essentially the most German targeted developer.

Quicker velocity additionally creates issues: Capital

Creating (and proudly owning) Windfarms is a really capital intensive enterprise. If, for an current pipeline, the velocity of improvement will get increased, this implies increased returns on Capital but in addition a requirement for (loads) extra capital.

Apparently, Energiekontor, which is without doubt one of the pioneers of “creating and proudly owning” enterprise mannequin has a really totally different apporach to ABO Wind.

The ABO WInd strategy: Mo’ Capital

On June 1st, ABO Wind dropped a bombshell by asserting that they plan to vary their company construction from a “regular” German inventory cooperation (AG) to a KGaA. The KGaA additionally has listed shares, however on account of a distinct Goevrnance, the general public sharehiolders have solely a really restricted say in how the corporate is run.

On June thirteenth, ABO Wind launched a Webcast the place one of many founders along with the IR man tried to elucidate why they’re doing it. The principle motive is that they need to elevate extra capital to be able to develop sooner, however the founders, who at present personal 52% don’t need to be diluted beneath 50%. The KGaA construction would allow them to go beneath 50% in possession however hold management.

In a subsequent name with the IR man, he talked about that they want the capital each, for sooner mission approvals but in addition so as to have the ability to maintain initiatives longer till they’re “turnkey” prepared. Up to now, ABO usually bought initiatives earlier, as an illustration on the “able to construct” stage. The explanation for that is that they need to hold extra of the developer margin.

I feel particularly particularly for the KGaA try, ABO Wind was pummeled closely, I’m not certain if they may get the required votes for this.

The Energiekontor strategy:

Energiekontor apparently has the precise reverse strategy. They really plan to promote initiatives sooner than previously to be able to use capital extra effectively:

Trying into this chart from the Energiekontor investor presentation clearly exhibits that 90%-95% of the worth creation occurs up till a plant is “able to construct”:

So from a capital allocation perspective, Energiekontor’s technique appears much more shareholder pleasant than ABO Wind. Apparently, Energiekontor has revealed a fairly aggressive forecast for 2028:

So Energiekontor plans to double EBIT by 2028 based mostly on 2023, which itself is 15-20% increased than 2022.

Earlier than I write myself drained, I reference the wonderful new (German language) Energiekontor write-up from Jon Neuscherler on Abilitato.

To summarize the attraction of Energiekontor in a number of factors:

  • most publicity to strongly rising German on-shore Wind reneweables market
  • founder owned/run
  • shareholder pleasant technique targeted on capital effectivity
  • comparatively conservative Stability sheet (Internet debt ~2,5x EBITDA)
  • Important upside if forecast is hit
  • represents a sure hedge in opposition to Power value shocks
  • The rise in velocity in German On Shore wind allow doesn’t appear to have been realized by the market to date

General, on the present valuation, one is underwriting a return of 15-17% p.a. which I feel is very enticing thought-about the comparatively restricted draw back danger.

After all there are dangers, similar to rising prices for wind parks, additional rising rates of interest, execution dangers and political dangers. However general, I take into account this as a really enticing danger/return profile and allotted 3% of my portfolio into Energiekontor at ~74,50 EUR per share. (For the file: In 2022, I purchased them at 63 EUR and bought at 91 EUR).

What about ABO Wind, PNE, 7C and Encavis ?

Through the Lively Possession Fund, I have already got publicity to PNE. ABO Wind is an organization that I nonetheless like from a basic perspective and is attractively valued, regardless of the much less shareholder pleasant startegy.

I do suppose that the inventory is at present a type of “particular state of affairs”. If the KGaA situation resolves itself a method otr the opposite, the share value may gain advantage. So I’ll hold the ABO Wind place in the meanwhile.

Dislaimer: This isn’t funding recommendation. PLEASE DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH !!!!



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here